A Nauru opposition MP says a new law that requires public servants intending to stand for parliament to quit their jobs three months before the election is designed to eliminate political rivals.
Transcript
A Nauru opposition MP says a new law that requires public servants intending to stand for parliament to quit their jobs three months before the election is designed to eliminate political rivals.
The bill was passed during a sitting of parliament last week, with the government justifying it by saying public servants who continued to work could abuse their position while campaigning.
But a former president, Sprent Dabwido, who has been suspended from parliament since the middle of 2014, says three months is too long for many people to go without an income.
The public service is Nauru's largest employer, and Mr Dabwido told Jamie Tahana the new rule is designed to put many people off contesting the election, which is due some time this year.
SPRENT DABWIDO: The new election law they passed in parliament last week is for anybody wishing to put their name up to be a member of parliament at the next election, they should resign from their work, three months ahead of the election.
JAMIE TAHANA: And what is your concern about it? You're suggesting that this could restrict the number of candidates.
SD: I think basically it is a deterrent to any person wishing to become a member of parliament so it's probably questionable whether it's in line with our constitution. I believe it will prevent a lot of people wanting to put their name up. For example, you know after serving in their office for let's say 20, 30 years, they're going to risk all that plus no with salary for three months plus you know the big question mark, if they don't win will they get their job back? So it's a big deterrent to anybody wishing to put their name up and I think it's unconstitutional we're going to have to look at that and get a legal opinion on it.
JT: The law saying that public servants must resign if they're running for parliament isn't unique around the world and also the government seems to be justifying it by saying the public servants could possibly abuse their position or government resources for their campaigns and stuff. There's a point to that isn't there?
SD: There is a point to that but there is much better ways of doing it, you can say you can resign one month ahead and you can say that well you can still maintain your salary during this one month so you can survive but you know, just public servant, you know you could be a bus driver, how's he going to abuse his driving the bus?
JT: So your main qualm with it I guess is the timeframe, that three months is too long.
SD: Three months, that's six pay cheques you know if you have a wife and kids, how can you go on for three months without salary, any normal person would find it very hard to survive. This kind of law is made especially just for the government themselves.
Calls to the Nauru government have so far gone unanswered.
Correction, 5 February: An earlier version of this story incorrectly said Mr Dabwido was suspended from parliament in the middle of last year. He was suspended in the middle of 2014.
To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following:
See terms of use.