15 Sep 2025

Loafers Lodge accused's previous convictions read to court

7:55 pm on 15 September 2025
Loafers Lodge court case

The 50-year-old defendant's identity is suppressed. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii

The man accused of lighting the fatal Loafers Lodge blaze has previously been jailed for hitting someone on the head with a weapon and fracturing their skull, the High Court has heard.

The 50-year-old defendant, whose identity is suppressed, has denied murdering five people by setting the Wellington boarding house alight on 16 May, 2023.

He's on trial at the High Court in Wellington, where the jury had earlier been told the man was convicted of a "serious violent offence" in 2009, and attempted arson in 1996.

On Monday Crown lawyer Stephanie Bishop read out the statement of agreed evidence about his previous convictions, which contained further details about the offending - including that he has been convicted of 50 offences.

The serious violent offence in 2009 happened after the man had been drinking for a number of hours, following an argument with his partner at the time.

"[The defendant] retrieved a weapon from his car and used it to hit a person on the head.

"This caused a significant wound, and a fracture to their skull," Bishop said.

He was sentenced to six years in prison.

The attempted arson in 1996 happened after the defendant had been asked to leave a hotel due to his drinking.

He walked to a nearby butcher shop and threw a placard through the window, smashing it, before entering and setting a piece of paper alight on the counter.

The flames crept up to a metre in height, and lasted about two minutes.

"[The defendant] told police he wanted to burn down the butcher shop because he was angry at being asked to leave the hotel," Bishop said.

The man had also been convicted of common assault and fraud, she said.

On Monday the defence also opened its case, telling the jury the man was insane when he lit the fire, and he did not know it was wrong.

Their first witness, Dr Krishna Pillai, said by lighting the fire the man wanted to scare people he believed were out to get him, and he did not intend to hurt them.

The Crown's case is that the man did know it was wrong, and that he lit the fire because he didn't like living there.

The trial continues.

Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

Get the RNZ app

for ad-free news and current affairs